War of the Worlds Extinction 2024 - Movies (Mar 28th)
Sex-Positive 2024 - Movies (Mar 28th)
The Farmers Daughter 2025 - Movies (Mar 28th)
Dangerous Lies Unmasking Belle Gibson 2025 - Movies (Mar 28th)
Flight Risk 2025 - Movies (Mar 28th)
Alexander and the Terrible Horrible No Good Very Bad Road Trip 2025 - Movies (Mar 28th)
The Life List 2025 - Movies (Mar 28th)
Renner 2025 - Movies (Mar 28th)
The Rule of Jenny Pen 2024 - Movies (Mar 28th)
Bring Them Down 2024 - Movies (Mar 27th)
Love Hurts 2025 - Movies (Mar 27th)
Holland 2025 - Movies (Mar 27th)
The House Was Not Hungry Then 2025 - Movies (Mar 27th)
One Million Babes BC 2024 - Movies (Mar 27th)
Through the Door 2024 - Movies (Mar 27th)
Snow White 2025 - Movies (Mar 27th)
England’s Lions The New Generation 2025 - Movies (Mar 26th)
The Last Keeper 2024 - Movies (Mar 26th)
The Brutalist 2024 - Movies (Mar 25th)
Mufasa The Lion King 2024 - Movies (Mar 25th)
The Monkey 2025 - Movies (Mar 25th)
The One Show - (Mar 29th)
On Patrol- Live - (Mar 29th)
The Last Word with Lawrence ODonnell - (Mar 29th)
The Rachel Maddow Show - (Mar 29th)
The Patrick Star Show - (Mar 29th)
Helsinki Crimes - (Mar 29th)
One Killer Question - (Mar 29th)
The Bold and the Beautiful - (Mar 29th)
Cops - (Mar 29th)
The Price Is Right - (Mar 29th)
The Young and the Restless - (Mar 29th)
Lets Make a Deal - (Mar 29th)
The Kelly Clarkson Show - (Mar 29th)
All In with Chris Hayes - (Mar 29th)
Diners, Drive-Ins and Dives - (Mar 29th)
Gold Rush - (Mar 29th)
Horrible Histories - (Mar 29th)
WWE SmackDown - (Mar 29th)
The Beat with Ari Melber - (Mar 28th)
Gogglebox - (Mar 28th)
It looks like there was quite a bit of Disney family backing for this occasionally quite insightful look at the roles of women in cinema over the decades, but unfortunately Nina Menkes chose to use a lecture as the template for her message and the ensuing delivery is probably more notable for it's sweeping generalisations than it is for any potent points it wishes to make. Her message about the historical objectification of women at the hands of largely (heterosexual) men drags in far too many films and genres without really detailing just who was directing what - on screen or from the office. Nor, indeed, does it begin to address that many of these men would have been facing a considerable degree of sexual repression of their own - and a legal one, at that, as they made their films. The simplicity of many of the statements aren't backed up by any of the actors or directors providing comment - contemporary or archive - on why they chose to make films that may or may not have compromised their actor's sexual and/or artistic integrity. The likes of Katharine Hepburn, Bette Davis, Greta Garbo and Marlene Dietrich were, to an extent, made by their male directors and producers but would anyone argue that they compromised their identity to become stars? If so, then was this because of a male dominated studio system or maybe because that's what the wider American - this documentary doesn't attempt with any weight to look at the far more interesting European cinema environment - public actually wanted. To what extent are any of her assertions, and those of her assembled collection of academics and C-listers, taking into account the market for which these works are intended. Again, there's no redress for the cinema going punters. Great detail is gone into about the sexualisation of the female body, of violence - physical, psychological or implied; but again we have no input from the directors or the writers who created these images and characters to explain any rationale. Nor do we really hear about the motivations from the participators who needed the work, wanted the fame, wanted the money, or who didn't see any of it as prurient or exploitative at all. It's the very one-sided earnestness that disappoints. Balance wouldn't necessarily have diluted the thrust, but it might have illustrated far better the intricacies both commercial and personal of an industry as riddled with flaws and inconsistencies as the society it serves.
After the death of her abusive father, lonely librarian Martha finds herself caught up in a strange, sadomasochistic relationship with a monstrous husband whom she begins to suspect may be trying to murder her.
Wealthy rancher Bick Benedict and dirt-poor cowboy Jett Rink both woo Leslie Lynnton, a beautiful young woman from Maryland who is new to Texas. She marries Benedict, but she is shocked by the racial bigotry of the White Texans against the local people of Mexican descent. Rink discovers oil on a small plot of land, and while he uses his vast, new wealth to buy all the land surrounding the Benedict ranch, the Benedict's disagreement over prejudice fuels conflict that runs across generations.
October 2003, Alma and Lila Levy are excluded from the Lycée Henri Wallon in Aubervilliers solely because they were wearing a headscarf. What follows is a deafening political and media debate, justifying in most cases the exclusion of girls wearing head-scarves to school. February 2004, a law was eventually passed by the National Assembly. "A thinly veiled racism" is about this controversy since the affair of Creil in 1989 (where two schoolgirls were excluded for the same reasons) and attempts to "reveal" that maybe what hides behind is the desire to exclude these girls. This film gives them a voice as well as others - teachers, community activists, feminists, researchers - gathered around the group "A School for You-All" fighting for the repeal of this law they consider sexist and racist ... This movie was censured in Septembre 2004 in France.
In response to political pressure from Senator Lillian DeHaven, the U.S. Navy begins a program that would allow for the eventual integration of women into its combat services. The program begins with a single trial candidate, Lieutenant Jordan O'Neil, who is chosen specifically for her femininity. O'Neil enters the grueling Navy SEAL training program under the command of Master Chief John James Urgayle, who unfairly pushes O'Neil until her determination wins his respect.
When cocky military lawyer Lt. Daniel Kaffee and his co-counsel, Lt. Cmdr. JoAnne Galloway, are assigned to a murder case, they uncover a hazing ritual that could implicate high-ranking officials such as shady Col. Nathan Jessep.
On what seems to be just another ordinary day, a man is exposed to sexism and sexual violence in a society ruled by women.
Darren vies for a promotion while facing sexism from his co-workers in a gender-swapped world.
Women are sexually insulted and threatened by men every day. Experts around the world are registering an anti-feminist backlash that seems to be on the verge of becoming socially acceptable. Particularly affected: women in publicly visible positions – such as politicians, actresses or entrepreneurs. Who is behind the attacks and what are the motives?
Through a training trip, in which the filmmakers also participate, the contrasts that exist between the conservatism of machismo and the new masculinity are evident; testimonies, discoveries and liberation in a circle of men.
A group of idealistic, but frustrated, liberals succumb to the temptation of murdering rightwing pundits for their political beliefs.
This documentary is about sexism and masculinity. It’s also a journey through reflections on male condition, an attempt to strip away beliefs, myths and prejudices about masculinity. Why is there violence against women? We try to answer that by the hand of a former pimp trapped by his past and an artist, son of a prostitute, who transforms his pain into provocative performances. In parallel, the class of a high school teacher and a team of publicists become debate scenarios on the same theme, while interspersed reflections of several influential men who address the issue of masculinity from multiple points of view. A rich and complex approach that invites us to reflect on our own gender related education and socialization.