The Bad Shepherd 2024 - Movies (Jan 17th)
The Bouncer 2024 - Movies (Jan 17th)
Tuesdays Trash 2024 - Movies (Jan 17th)
Balloonerism 2025 - Movies (Jan 17th)
The Girl Who Cried Her Eyes Out 2024 - Movies (Jan 17th)
Clear Cut 2024 - Movies (Jan 17th)
You Gotta Believe 2024 - Movies (Jan 17th)
Wolf Man 2025 - Movies (Jan 17th)
My Divorce Party 2024 - Movies (Jan 17th)
A Quiet Place Day One 2024 - Movies (Oct 2nd)
Cabrini 2024 - Movies (Oct 2nd)
Back in Action 2025 - Movies (Jan 17th)
Henry Danger The Movie 2025 - Movies (Jan 17th)
Alarum 2025 - Movies (Jan 17th)
Ed Hill Stupid Ed 2024 - Movies (Jan 16th)
Alien Rubicon 2024 - Movies (Jan 17th)
Smile 2 2024 - Movies (Jan 16th)
Gabriel Iglesias Legend of Fluffy 2025 - Movies (Jan 16th)
The Substance 2024 - Movies (Jan 16th)
Unstoppable 2024 - Movies (Jan 16th)
Here 2024 - Movies (Jan 16th)
The Bad Shepherd 2024 - ()
The Bouncer 2024 - ()
Tuesdays Trash 2024 - ()
Balloonerism 2025 - ()
The Girl Who Cried Her Eyes Out 2024 - ()
Clear Cut 2024 - ()
You Gotta Believe 2024 - ()
Wolf Man 2025 - ()
My Divorce Party 2024 - ()
A Quiet Place Day One 2024 - ()
Cabrini 2024 - ()
Back in Action 2025 - ()
Henry Danger The Movie 2025 - ()
Alarum 2025 - ()
Ed Hill Stupid Ed 2024 - ()
Alien Rubicon 2024 - ()
Smile 2 2024 - ()
Gabriel Iglesias Legend of Fluffy 2025 - ()
The Substance 2024 - ()
Unstoppable 2024 - ()
**Brilliant, but panned by predictable critics** (SPOILERS TOWARDS END!) I don't always agree with (or heed warnings) from movie critics; perhaps because I used to be one myself in a nation wide magazine many years ago -- but if a movie has a 40% rating on Metacritic, I admit it rarely bodes well. Still I watched this, largely due to the involvement of several favorite actors and the script having been written by the Duplass brothers. I found it almost instantly both funny and moving, and the longer I watched, the more confused I became as to why most critics had been lukewarm or downright dismissive of it. I figured it had to be mostly due to the genre blend of comedy and more dramatic issues, and that probably most of the criticism had been along the usual lines of "can't make up it's mind', etc. But even so, that didn't add up to a meager 40% rating, with such a clever script and great acting. When the credits rolled, I knew instantly why: A happy ending... It all mostly works out in the end for the oddball protagonists. Critics in general can't stand it. If a movie has had a degree of realism and/or several dark or borderline dark-ish issues brought up along the way, critics tend to go ******* unless it all ends in misery, or largely unresolved, or at the very least in ambiguity. God forbid you walk away from such a movie actually feeling good; that equals 'cheesy' in most reviewers book. Was it realistic that most of the people involved got a happy, somewhat romantic ending? Of course not, but though the movie tackles several 'real' issues within the comedy, I found the ending perfectly fitting with the tone of it. Critics often use the word 'predictable' about anything that has a hint of romantic comedy in it, but I'd say, there are few things as predictable as movie critics in general. If you want to read what I consider a spot on review for this, check out Empire Magazine, who went against the stream and gave it 4 out of 5 stars.
**It was not a table of honour!** I thought it was some B movie. Expecting anything from it is like a total waste. But that was not the case. I was surprised how simple it was, yet very entertaining. Not all the small films like this would do the same magic. Everything in the was like I already seen in other films, even though I enjoyed it thoroughly. It was a one-day event tale and in the backdrop of a wedding. In that, the film focused on one particular table, the table number 19 on the outskirt the dining hall. They all came from different background and never met before. They learn about each other, and their personal issues open up during the cerebration. Apart from that, they mess up a few things and later try to fix it, that all comes into play before it reaches the end. From the director of 'Rocket Science', which came a decade ago, also starred by Anna Kendrick. I think he is a fine director, at least in small comedies with the good quality screenplay. So he should be doing more feature films than the television series. I was impressed by Kendrick. Her choices of films might not be the greatest, but she's almost there and very soon going to give a career best for sure. The remaining cast was funnily good. I think this film deserves a sequel. Because the film characters are very distinctive and has left behind a lot about them which need to be revealed. Sequel or prequel, it does not matter, but I'll be surely looking for one. Look at its cost, just $5 million. Big production houses can give away such tiny amount without expecting any returns. You might see it rated low everywhere, but for me, it is a good comedy. One of the best small budget films. Yeah, the end was very clichéd, but acceptable for such film. I would definitely suggest it for those who won't anticipate in films they watch. Particularly if you prefer simple storyline and a few laughs, it is the one. _7/10_
Set in 1920, Inge travels from Germany to rural Minnesota in order to meet the man destined to be her husband.
Master Maeng is very proud that an influential family will soon be his esteemed in-laws when his loving daughter, Mi-yeon, marries their son. A few days before the wedding Maeng hears a rumor that his future son-in-law has a cripple leg. Regretting that he can't give his lovely daughter to a cripple, he decides to marry his maid to him instead. Unexpectedly the future son-in-law shows up at the wedding hall and he is not a cripple, but a healthy and handsome youth. Feeling embarrassed, there is no way but to wed the maid to him. The Wedding Day is a recreation of A Happy Day of Jinsa Maeng, a comical play by Oh Yeong Jin. The first Korean film to win an international film award, the Best Comedy Award at the 1957 edition of the Asian Film Festival (now Asia Pacific Film Festival).
When writer's block derails the literary dreams of Olly Pickering, he has to move in with his friend Murray after losing all his money. Things start to look up when Olly's college pal James asks him to be the best man at his wedding. Prior to the nuptials, Olly is drawn to a woman whom he thinks is the bride's sister - only she turns out to be the bride, Sarah. Can Murray, who dislikes James, help get Sarah and Olly together?
Fast, frenetic, and furious best describe the story of five teenage boys all but abandoned by the system, estranged from any parents, and discarded by life in general. They build a world of there own in which gangs, drugs, fighting, body piercing, self-harm, and even suicide are considered commonplace. The film highlights their harrowing place in time and this small world; where brotherhood is valued above all else. Impressively acted by actual street kids, the movie highlights a gritty side of modern-day Singaporean life.
When Fernando accidentally rips the designer dress of a reality show star, he races to replace it, putting his own wedding at risk.
Deaf-mute Sergey enters a specialized boarding school for the deaf-and-dumb. In navigating through the school's hierarchy, he encounters a corrupt underbelly of criminality, known as The Tribe. By participating in several robberies, he gets propelled higher into the organization, when he meets one of the Chief’s concubines Anya, and unwittingly breaks all the unwritten rules of the group.
In the communist Romania of Nicolae Ceausescu, a young Romanian woman marries a German citizen just to leave the country.
While planning her first wedding, Annalise is shocked to discover the best man is her ex-boyfriend. Meanwhile, inn owners Olivia and Mick both have secret plans in the works.
Set during the early part of his reign, Ivan faces betrayal from the aristocracy and even his closest friends as he seeks to unite the Russian people. Sergei Eisenstein's final film, this is the first part of a three-part biopic of Tsar Ivan IV of Russia, which was never completed due to the producer's dissatisfaction with Eisenstein's attempts to use forbidden experimental filming techniques and excessive cost overruns. The second part was completed but not released for a decade after Eisenstein's death and a change of heart in the USSR government toward his work; the third part was only in its earliest stage of filming when shooting was stopped altogether.